Hyderabad before Hyderabad – Part II

The Andhras

Before Sultan Quli founded the Golconda Sultanate in 1512, general Deccan/Andhra history is all that can be used to understand what would have happened in the region for the 1800 years between the Andhras and Sultan Quli. The rulers in question may have been elsewhere, but one cannot deny the cultural and political impact being part of these kingdoms would have had on the region and its people.

The early Andhras were tribal kings whose kingdom presumably originated from the banks of the Godavari in the fertile Krishna-Godavari delta. According to the Mahabharata, they even fought at Kurukshetra, albeit for both sides. They are mentioned in texts that vary from the Vedas to the accounts of Megasthenes, who is responsible for Andhra blogs everywhere boasting about the kingdom’s “30 walled cities, infantry of 1,00,000, 2,000 cavalry and 1000 elephants”. But the overall picture presented is pretty uniform – they were a strong, independent kingdom, largely left undisturbed. (Yes, there is a whole lot written about the Northern “Aryans” bringing “civilization” to the South; but we will not talk about that here – we don’t want a Rediff-level comments section) Even during the Mauryan period, they were believed to have been left in-charge, despite the region becoming part of the empire during the reign of Bindusara (or Chandragupta Maurya, according to some historians). The decline of the Mauryan empire during the 3rd Century BCE marked the beginning of a relatively prosperous and more importantly, stable period in the region’s history, one that would last for over 400 years.

The Satavahanas?

This was the origin of the Satavahana kingdom. Or so we think. While there is no direct evidence linking the identity of the Andhra Kings to the Satavahanas, historians equate the two based on commonalities in the names of certain kings mentioned and succession information that is common to the both of them. But this theory was not without controversy. For one thing, the ancient texts that talk about the Andhra kings never mention the name of the dynasty and the Satavahana coins don’t mention anything about being kings of “Andhra Desa” either. Moreover, the Satavahanas maintained their records in Prakrit, not Telugu and their coins were initially found mainly in Maharashtra, not in Eastern Deccan, where the Andhra Kings were said to have been. But an equal number of historians explained them away:  a) Kings don’t exactly always mention their geographical heritage everywhere. None of the post-Satavahana dynasties did. b) Telugu might have been the Andhras’ first language but it must be remembered the use of Prakrit was the Buddhist lingua franca during the period – it was used both by Ashoka and the Satavahanas’ successors. and c) Satavahana coins were eventually found in Andhra and besides, it is well known that they extended their empire to Maharashtra anyway.

So there. Andhra Kings/ Andhrabhritya = Satavahanas.

The Satavahanas

satavahana_domainImage Source: History of the Andhras (1988) by Durga Prasad

“The Andhras were not slow to take advantage of the opportunity given by the death of the great emperor (Ashoka), and, very soon after the close of his reign, set up as an independent power under the government of a king named Simuka. The new dynasty extended its sway with such extraordinary rapidity that, in the reign of the second king, Krishna (Kanha), the town of Nasik, near the source of the Godavari in the Western Ghats, was included in the Andhra dominions, which thus stretched across India.” – History of India (1906): Volume 2 – From the Sixth Century B.C. to the Mohammedan Conquest, Including the Invasion of Alexander the Great

Simuka Satavahana is generally agreed upon as the founder of the dynasty. However, it is important to understand that he did not exactly “found” the kingdom – it is more likely that he brought the prominent tribal leaders together and formed the kingdom by making them acknowledge him as their leader. Moreover, they were part of the Mauryan empire and therefore, not fully independent. It was during the the reign of Simuka’s successor (and brother), Krishna/Kanha that things changed and expansion started. The 6th Satavahana, Satakarni II, even took on the title of ‘Dakshinapathapati’ (Lord of the South). The 17th king, Hala, on the other hand, was known for dramatically different things. He wrote ‘Gatha Saptasati’, an anthology of erotic verses composed in the vernacular dialect, a distinct departure from the classics of the time. It also supposedly earned him a mention in Vatsayana’s Kama Sutra (unverified).

The dynasty reached its peak in the first century AD, under Gautamiputra Satakarni (yes, too many a Satakarni) – the kingdom was said to have had the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea, the Godavari and the Narmada bordering it. He is also responsible for protecting the kingdom from Sakas, Yavanas and Pahlavas (We’re still not too sure who these guys were. They might have been the Pallavas’ predecessors. Or not.).

satavahana_shipcoinsOne of the main reasons for the prosperity of the dynasty, apart from successful military conquests, was flourishing trade. The Nanaghat inscriptions, apart from being one of the earliest sources of Hindu numerals, inform us of the Satavahanas’ conquest of the region. This conquest brought the Junnar pass into their kingdom, thereby opening up the Konkan region to them; the important Paithan – Ujjain land route was now under their control. Nauthical-themed Satavahana coins and the discovery of Roman coins in Andhra Pradesh confirm the existence of thriving overseas trade. (Image Source: Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India, 1977)

And as with most stories like these, it was after Gautamiputra that the decline started. The dynasty that gave us the Saka calender (No, the Sakas did not give us the Saka era. Their defeat at the hands of the Satavahanas did.), the Ajanata caves (probably) and other Buddhist monuments, despite the Kings following a Vedic religion (Satakarnii II conducted the Aswamedha Yagam, even), came to an end in the first half of the 5th Century AD. Their kingdom was split between a bunch of contemporary kings. Amongst them were the Ikshavakus.

Sources:

Durga Prasad (1988). History of the Andhras

Moti Chandra. (1977). Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India.

A. V. Williams Jackson. (Ed.). (1906). History of India: Volume 2 – From the Sixth Century B.C. to the Mohammedan Conquest, Including the Invasion of Alexander the Great

Advertisements

About Double ka Meetha

Chronicler of all things Hyderabadi. And old.
This entry was posted in Before the Sultanate, The Kingdoms and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Hyderabad before Hyderabad – Part II

  1. Pingback: Hyderabad before Hyderabad – Part III | The City & The City

  2. Pingback: Ajanta & The Hyderabad Connection | The City & The City

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s